Cargo bed, although smaller than those of full-size competitors, could still carry a four-foot wide sheet of material, which is an unofficial industry standard for measuring trunk space.ĭuring its lengthy production run, Ranger offered several engine choices in many variants. Ranger was available only as a two-door version, with an extended cab coming as an option. Plenty of space with enough legroom and headroom, comfortable seats and various other details were some requirements it had to meet. The design and general layout of the interior focused on potential buyers who wanted more than just a work truck. With flat surfaces and straight edges mated to a characteristic front grille and headlight design, it looked as a scaled-down F-150. Ranger featured body lines that mimicked those of larger F-series trucks and a flagship LTD, later known as Crown Victoria. While the technology underneath it was ahead of its time, the outer design was quite conservative. Unveiled in the spring of 1983, the first ever Ranger hit the showroom floors several months ahead of schedule as to beat the upcoming Chevrolet S-10 to the punch. Another notable innovation was the twin-beam front suspension, which offered improved road comfort and driving dynamics than a live axle while keeping the sturdiness for off-road use. In addition, the use of lightweight materials such as aluminum and magnesium helped keep the weight down. Thanks to extensive wind tunnel testing, this truck had a drag coefficient lower than most family cars of that time. The newly designed truck, now named Ranger instead of Yuma, featured many improvements and innovations, making it anything but F-series little brother. After several years of development, and a considerable amount of money, the first American compact pickup truck was ready for production. To meet these goals, the focus of project Yuma was on flexibility, quality and overall efficiency. This called for lighter vehicles and smaller engines. With the upcoming years bringing strict fuel economy and emission standards, all manufacturers faced challenges of downsizing. Starting in 1976 under the codename Yuma, this project was crucial for Ford and their future role in the light-truck market. Only noticeable differences were the front grille, which resembled larger F-series and large single headlights that did away with the small double ones on the Japanese sibling.Īlongside with the Courier, which was a temporary solution from the start, Ford started developing their own compact pickup truck. These two models shared chassis, engines, gearboxes and most of the body work. Being designed and manufactured by Mazda itself, this was a textbook example of badge engineering. The first compact pickup truck with blue oval emblem, called Courier, was a rebranded Mazda B-Series truck. As a countermeasure, Ford resorted to stop-gap solutions, just like GM and Chrysler, who partnered up with Isuzu and Mitsubishi. Vehicles like Datsun 521 and the original Toyota Hilux started gaining popularity. When it comes to pickup trucks, only Japanese manufacturers were prepared for this environment. This situation caught the Big Three off-guard, as they had only several models aligned with market demands of that time. This made buyers turn their focus from big, gas-thirsty vehicles to smaller and more efficient variants. During the 70s, frequent conflicts in the Middle East hampered supply of crude oil and caused fuel shortages. This story, just like many other things in the automotive industry, starts with a crisis.
Throughout these years, it held a considerable market share and rack up respectable sales figures of over 7 million units sold.
It’s not often you find these online for free you normally have to pay for them.Ranger is Ford’s attempt in a crowded compact pickup truck, whose production spans for several decades and four generations.
If, however, you do know how to read a wiring diagram, do your best to get your hands on one for the circuit you’re working on.
It might seem expensive up front, but in the end, you might find that you save a great deal by not pursuing the problem yourself. If that’s the case and you’ve checked all the basics and still have an electrical problem, perhaps it’s time to take the issue to a professional. I realize that if you don’t know how to read a wiring diagram, you’re in the same position as not having one. A wiring diagram is the roadmap for a particular circuit. It will take longer and perhaps cause you a great deal of frustration if you don’t have a wiring diagram for the circuit you’re working on.
Don’t get into an electrical diagnosis without a wiring diagram. The same is true for electrical problems. Would you go on a long road trip to someplace you’ve never been without a map or, at the very least, some directions? Probably not. Solving Automotive Electrical Problems Find a Wiring Diagram 07 Feb